Happy 6th Birthday Alex!

The little guy turned 6 today. We're so proud of you sweetheart!


Click to see more pics

Plus more recent goings-on at my On The Road blog:

Spring Training

Fountain Hills Great Fair

Ann Coulter

Sane, intelligent people have Keith Olbermann.


Conservative mouth-breathers have Ann Coulter:

"I was going to comment on John Edwards,'' she told the crowd here at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference, "but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you say the word faggot.''

Many speakers today told jokes about Al Gore's heated pool, and there was a whole panel discussion on the wa-hoo hilarity of the global warming "debate.'' But natch, Coulter took it up a notch: "Why don't they put solar panels on Al Gore?'' And, "Did Al Gore swallow Michael Moore?'' And, "You know what they say about guys with small carbon footprints.''

She also referred to Barack Obama as "B. Hussein Obama,'' and said Hillary was already at work on hiring her White House team, "a group of hard-working men and women, none of whom is named Monica.''

And as much as we'd like to think she's on the fringe, she's not. The Republican Great White Hope, Mitt Romney, complimented her for being a "moderate".

Republicans ... you should be proud.

The Myth of Illegal Immigration Crime

If you asked most people, they would indicate to you that an increase of immigration (legal and illegal) would spell the doom of their community. "There goes the neighborhood." But a new study would find fault with this assumption. Study: Immigrant crime rate low:

By MARLA JO FISHER
The Orange County Register
IRVINE – Immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than native-born Americans, according to a study released Monday by a UC Irvine professor for the Immigration Policy Center, based in Washington D.C.

UCI sociology professor Ruben Rumbaut found that immigrants of all national backgrounds were incarcerated at much lower rates than their American-born counterparts, according to the 2000 Census. The numbers applied to both legal and illegal immigrants.

His study also described a precipitous drop in crime rates nationwide throughout recent years – a period during which immigration has been at all-time record high. "While immigration is going up, crime is going down," Rumbaut said. "I think it's important to get the facts out there."

"Even as the undocumented population has doubled to 12 million since 1994, the violent crime rate in the United States has declined 34.2 percent and the property crime rate has fallen 26.4 percent," according to the report.

That crime drop was true even in cities with large immigrant populations such as Los Angeles or Miami, the report said. Orange County was not studied specifically.

According to the study, 3.5 percent of American-born men aged 18 to 39 were incarcerated in jails or prisons in 2000, compared to 0.7 percent of foreign-born men – five times higher.

The risk of incarceration went up significantly by the second or third generations of immigrants, according to the study.

John Keeley, spokesman for the Center for Immigration Studies, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank focused on immigration reform, disputed the results of the study and said census data for incarcerated and other institutionalized people were flawed in 2000.

Keeley added that migrant communities tend to underreport crimes and that all immigrant criminals might not be in jail.

Keeley also said that the children of immigrants posed a crime problem not considered in the statistics.

"That is something we intend to monitor in terms of gang activity and truancy," Keeley said.

Rumbaut co-authored the study with Harvard University professor Walter A. Ewing.

They reported that "the impression that immigration and criminality are linked" is a myth fueled by political expediency and groups with outside agendas.

Rumbaut said politicians frequently exploit fears about immigrant crime for their own purposes – or pander to uninformed voters. While immigrants may underreport crimes, the data still holds true for homicides and other crimes that are fully reported, he said.

"There has been a Mount Everest of data going back 100 years that indicates immigrants have a low crime rate," Rumbaut said.

So why do we continue to associate immigration with violent crime and property crime? And please spare me the line about all illegal immigrants already having committed a crime by being here. It's not constructive and it's not relevant to this study.

A lot of it is human nature. Throughout history, we have tried to blame the outsiders for anything that goes wrong (Jews, Italians, Irish, etc.). A lot of it is xenophobia. "Those people don't look like us or sound like us. They don't worship the right God."

And a lot of it is that those people that we should be able to trust to be level-headed and truthful mislead us. President Bush's Immigration Reform Address

"Illegal immigration puts pressure on public schools and hospitals, it strains state and local budgets, and brings crime to our communities."

If you have concerns about immigration ... fine. Many people have valid ones. But don't try to pretty up your racism by saying that you are only concerned about our safety.

Don't be gay, Spark!

A billboard advertising the Phoenix conference (Photo Credit: Daniel Greene)

Yay. Phoenix was lucky enough to host the latest "gay conversion" conference recently, Love Won Out, sponsored by ... you guessed it, Focus on the Family. Now, it would be way too easy to make fun of them for having a conference like this. But just because something is easy doesn't mean we shouldn't do it anyway.

I feel a South Park episode coming on:

Stan: Now, don't be gay! Don't be gay, Spark! Don't be gay!

Mr. Garrison: Gay people, well, gay people are EVIL, evil right down to their cold black hearts which pump not blood like yours or mine, but rather a thick, vomitous oil that oozes through their rotten veins and clots in their pea-sized brains which becomes the cause of their Nazi-esque patterns of violent behavior. Do you understand?

Jesus: A lot of people have asked for my position on homosexuality, and I would like to set the record straight, once and for all.
Voice-over: We interrupt Jesus and Pals for this commercial break!

I heard about the conference on our local NPR affiliate. In addition to the conference, it was announced that Pastor Ted, Ted Haggard, was thinking of relocating to Phoenix after his successful "conversion".

Those associated with the conference seem to be taking great pains to stress that you can't force someone to change and that is needs to be a personal choice to change. But the immersion type therapy that Haggard went through after falling from grace tells me something different. If you listen to the NPR broadcast, you hear a California family interviewed. They are evangelical and they have a 16 year old gay son. They see the conference as an opportunity for him to see God's way. They obviously feel something is wrong with him or they wouldn't have brought him. He, rightly so, doesn't feel there is anything wrong with himself. Who would you say has the healthier attitude? Homosexuality isn't something to be cured. Do you see the gay community having conferences with seminars to help cure heterosexuals?

For a spirited discussion on religion and homosexuality, check out Sadie's recent Killer Post series.

The Police

Woo-hoo!! I got tickets to the June 18th Police concert in Phoenix. I rule.

Breach

First of all, I'm going to get the stuff out of the way that really has nothing to do with how good the movie is ... but it sure adds to the overall enjoyment of the experience. To wit, one of the all-time best places to watch a movie: at a movie theater in a casino. We were in Laughlin, NV this weekend and late one night I took in a movie by myself at the Riverside. And why is that a good place to watch a movie, you may ask? Well, with your nachos and Junior Mints, you can buy a tall frosty beer. Even the worst movie looks better when you are sipping 24 oz of lager. But with a very good movie, it makes it into the perfect experience. For example, with a movie like Breach.



Breach is in the vein of true spy thrillers like The Falcon and the Snowman, with Sean Penn and Timoty Hutton. It chronicles how FBI upstart Eric O'Neill helped to bring his boss, Robert Hanssen, an agent who was ultimately convicted of selling secrets to the Soviet Union, to justice. I love spy stories, both fictional and otherwise. I've read many accounts of real operatives and this story rings true.

The cast is very good. Ryan Phillipe is suprisingly effective as the young FBI agent charged with investigating his superior. With movies like this and Crash, Phillipe has done a very good job of casting off the petulant teenager image that I had of him from movies like Cruel Intentions. Chris Cooper is even more effective, not suprisingly, as the convicted spy, Robert Hannsen. The role is a lot like the one he had in The Bourne Identity. Chris Cooper rarely has a bad performance. Laura Linney is also very good.

The movie does a good job of not just portraying Hannsen as a villain. It gives you glimpses into the possible motivations for his betrayel. Phillipe's character while coming to understand how much damage Hannsen had done, also begrudgingly respects him because of his maverick attitude.

It is very intelligent (not dumbed-down) and doesn't get caught up in intrigue that rarely happens in real espionage (car chases, gun battles). Real espionage is more about the details, the routine.

The colors and the cinematography are muted, evoking the drab, gray and white image that one would have of Washington D.C. government offices in the fall. Surely spies must spy on bright days too, but sunny 80 degree days don't quite fit how we imagine it.

Breach is well-crafted and well-paced, not running too long and successfully maintains your interest. I'd recommend it. Grade: B+

VNSA Book Sale

Here are the highlights of the books that I picked up at this year's VNSA Used Book Sale -- 50 years of selling gobs of used books to benefit local charities (AZ Friends of Foster Children, Literacy Volunteers of Maricopa Country, and Toby House:

Sci-Fi

The Light of Other Days by Arthur C. Clarke and Stephen Baxter
Half-Life by Hal Clement
Deus Irae by Philip K. Dick and Roger Zelazny
Schild's Ladder by Greg Egan
(The Lathe of Heaven, The Dispossessed, The Wind's Twelve Quarters) & The Left Hand of Darkness by Ursula K. Le Guin
Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut

Science Non-Fiction

Dinosaur in a Haystack
The Mismeasure of Man
Questioning the Millenium
Wonderful Life
all by Stephen Jay Gould
From Lucy to Languange by Donald Johanson and Blake Edgar
Abusing Science - The Case Against Creationism by Philip Kitcher
The Demon-Haunted World - Science as a Candle in the Dark by Carl Sagan
Comet by Carl Sagan and Anne Druyan

Political

An Hour Before Daylight
Keeping Faith
Turning Point
all by Jimmy Carter
Boy Genius (Karl Rove) by Lou Dubose

Misc

Twilight of the Idols - The Anti-Christ by Nietzsche
The Conquest of Happiness by Bertrand Russell
Silent Bob Speaks - The Collected Writings of Kevin Smith
also, several books on oriental rugs, art, and a textbook on film

Norah Jones -- "My Dear Country"

I bought my wife the latest Norah Jones disk for Valentine's Day. I was pleased to see that she was not afraid to address current events. My Political Song of the Day:

'twas halloween and the ghosts were out,
and everywhere they'd go, they shout,
and though i covered my eyes i knew,
they'd go away.

but fear's the only thing i saw,
and three days later 'twas clear to all,
that nothing is as scary as election day.

but the day after is darker,
and darker and darker it goes,
who knows, maybe the plans will change,
who knows, maybe he's not deranged.

the news men know what they know, but they,
know even less than what they say,
and i don't know who i can trust,
for they come what may.

'cause we believed in our candidate,
but even more it's the one we hate,
i needed someone i could shake,
on election day.

but the day after is darker,
and deeper and deeper we go,
who knows, maybe it's all a dream,
who knows if i'll wake up and scream.

i love the things that you've given me,
i cherish you my dear country,
but sometimes i don't understand,
the way we play.

i love the things that you've given me,
and most of all that i am free,
to have a song that i can sing,
on election day.

I especially like the last two groups of lyrics. They are a gentle reminder that appreciating the freedoms we enjoy in this country doesn't mean rubberstamping anything our leader says. It means actually exercising those freedoms when we see wrongs being done.

Abominations

I'm asking forgiveness for this one in advance ... but I couldn't help myself. Sadie posted the following excerpt from the bible (in an unrelated post):

These six things the LORD hates,
Yes, seven are an abomination to Him:
Proverbs 6:17
A proud look,
A lying tongue,
Hands that shed innocent blood,
Proverbs 6:18
A heart that devises wicked plans,
Feet that are swift in running to evil,
Proverbs 6:19
A false witness who speaks lies,
And one who sows discord among brethren.

Her posting was in a completely different context than I am submitting, but I didn't think my observation was relevant to her discussion and I didn't want to derail it since I'm very proud of her effort over there (a very intelligent, polite discussion on religion).

In any event, I am posting this because I believe someone that we all know very well and who claims to be very godly has violated every single one of these in spades. I found it humorous, ironic and sad all at the same time.

Grammy's

Kudos to the Dixie Chicks for cleaning up at the Grammy's last night.

From the NY Times:

... To some, the voting served not only as a referendum on President Bush’s handling of the Iraq war, but also on what was perceived as country music’s rejection — and radio’s censorship — of the trio.

... the academy represents “the artist community, which was very angry at what radio did, because it was not very American.”

At the awards on Sunday, the band — Natalie Maines, Martie Maguire and Emily Robison — swept all five of the Grammy categories in which it was nominated, including the top three — album, record and song of the year — the first time all three have been swept in 14 years.

The awards amounted to vindication for the Dixie Chicks, who found their career sidetracked in 2003 after the singer Ms. Maines told a London concert audience shortly before the invasion of Iraq that the band was “ashamed” that the president hailed from their home state, Texas. In the furor that followed, country radio programmers pulled the multiplatinum-selling trio’s music from the airwaves and rallied listeners to destroy their CDs.

The storm flared anew last year when the Dixie Chicks released the album “Taking the Long Way,” which included the single “Not Ready to Make Nice,” a defiant and bitter response to the group’s treatment. And things got worse when band members said in interviews that they were not interested in being part of the commercial country music business; Ms. Maguire, who plays the fiddle, said the group would rather have fans “who get it” instead of “people that have us in their five-disc changer with Reba McEntire and Toby Keith.” Country stations once again all but ignored the Dixie Chicks’ music.

The sweep reflected something of a retort to the Country Music Association’s annual awards, held in November, when the Dixie Chicks were shut out.

In an oddly fitting tribute to their moxie and to the the feelings of a large percentage of the country, one of our local heavy rock radio DJ's here in Phoenix said on the air how much he admired the Dixie Chicks and was glad they had won. In the world of entertainment and sports, where people will say something one day, and then recant the next day or where everything is filtered through publicists and corporate boards -- the Dixie Chicks stood up for what they believed in and never backed down even when a huge shitstorm threatened to bury them forever. In the typically homogenized and jingoistic world of Nashville and country music, that is saying something. Their music may sound country, but their attitude is pure rock-n-roll.

How apropos that Joan Baez introduced their performance last night. She knows just a little bit about politics and catching hell.

Not Ready to Make Nice

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Also, the Police ruled!!

Roxanne

And something that I never thought would happen, they are actually going to tour:

The Police announce plans for reunion tour

They are hitting both Phoenix and Vegas, so I'm going to try and get tickets for both shows. Money is no object. I'd do anything to catch these shows.

Duchess

I was all set to write a post on how good a time we had at the big VNSA Used Book Sale that we go to each year. But that was before we came home from the sale to find our pug, Duchess, listless and laboring to breathe. We rushed her to the vet, but looking in her eyes on the way, it was like a light had been switched off. Even before we got to the animal hospital, I think we both knew it was too late. The vet said it was most likely some kind of autoimmune disorder that finally just hit some threshold that sent her over the edge. We'll never know. Whatever had happened was not reversible and we had to have her put down. She couldn't breathe on her own any more and had lapsed into a coma.

I can hardly even write about it. But I just wanted to say something about what she meant to us. She was our "baby" before we had Alex. Her time with us spanned over half our marriage and the entire life of our son.



We took her on vacations or would have friends and family watch her. We never boarded her even when we went on vacation because were afraid of what she would think. We had adopted her from the Arizona Humane Society and we thought it might bring back memories if we put her in a kennel. Silly, I know. But she was people to us.




She got along great with other dogs (that's her best friend, Tasia) and with kids. We weren't sure how she'd react when we had Alex but she was nothing but loving and protecting from the very beginning. They were best buds and have always gotten along great.

It's obviously not on the level of a relative or close friend dying. But after having Duchess for 7 years, it's damn close. When a pet gets up to 10 years or so, you know that their days are numbered but it still comes as a shock. And usually there is a gradual deterioration. This was sudden. We're not sure what happened. Last night she was normal ... today, this.

I'll miss the way such a small dog could take up half the bed and steal all the covers. I'll miss the way she worked so hard to train us over the years. She would go and stare at her food bowl at 8:00 and 5:00 every day until you fed her. She was like clockwork. I'll miss the way she greeted us when we would get home each day with the kind of unconditional love that you could only dream of from most humans.

I can't even think about getting another dog at this point. I'm sure we will, but right now the pain is too acute.

Bodyworlds

We were lucky enough to check out the Bodyworlds 3 exhibit at the Arizona Science Center last night. For those of you who haven't heard of it, it's a traveling exhibition of real bodies that have been preserved through the process of Plastination. They are posed in creative and artistic poses and show various parts of the body. It's very cool and educational and despite how some newscasters portrayed it, it didn't gross me out at all. It prompted a lot of questions by Alex and I think it was a great learning experience for him.

Seeing real organs and muscles outside the confines of a flat textbook and seeing cross-sections of diseased organs allows a person to visualize much easier the effects of smoking and drinking.

Religious or not, what do you think about the sanctity of the human body after death? Is it desecration? The people whose bodies were preserved knowingly donated them for the very purpose. When I told my mom that we had went, I got a funny (odd) response. She's not religious at all and considers herself an agnostic/atheist but she said that she probably couldn't go to a show like that because she just gets an odd feeling around dead bodies. Almost like she senses an aura or force. She's probably just nutty (and I would know) but is there any truth to that? Could there be a presence unique to a person that isn't necessarily tied to religion? I don't think so, but what do I know?

"We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will." -- Chuck Palahniuk (author of Fight Club)

On Calling Bullshit

by Dan Froomkin
from Common Dreams
Mainstream-media political journalism is in danger of becoming increasingly irrelevant, but not because of the Internet, or even Comedy Central. The threat comes from inside. It comes from journalists being afraid to do what journalists were put on this green earth to do.

What is it about Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert that makes them so refreshing and attractive to a wide variety of viewers (including those so-important younger ones)? I would argue that, more than anything else, it is that they enthusiastically call bullshit.

Calling bullshit, of course, used to be central to journalism as well as to comedy. And we happen to be in a period in our history in which the substance in question is running particularly deep. The relentless spinning is enough to make anyone dizzy, and some of our most important political battles are about competing views of reality more than they are about policy choices. Calling bullshit has never been more vital to our democracy.

... increased corporate stultification of our industry, to the point where rocking the boat is seen as threatening rather than invigorating. There’s the intense pressure to maintain access to insider sources, even as those sources become ridiculously unrevealing and oversensitive. There’s the fear of being labeled partisan if one’s bullshit-calling isn’t meted out in precisely equal increments along the political spectrum.

The return of Democrats to political power and relevancy gives us the opportunity to call bullshit in a more bipartisan manner, which is certainly healthy. But there are different kinds of bullshit. Republican political leaders these past six years have built up a massive, unprecedented credibility deficit, such that even their most straightforward assertions invite close bullshit inspection. By contrast, Democratic bullshit tends to center more around hypocrisy and political cowardice. Trying to find equivalency between the two would still be a mistake – and could lead to catty, inside-baseball gotcha journalism rather than genuine bullshit-calling.

If mainstream-media political journalists don’t start calling bullshit more often, then we do risk losing our primacy — if not to the comedians then to the bloggers.

... Because the Internet so values calling bullshit, you are sitting on an as-yet largely untapped gold mine. I still believe that no one is fundamentally more capable of first-rate bullshit-calling than a well-informed beat reporter - whatever their beat...

That's the deal now days. If I want to get the straight scoop, I have to read a lot of sources and find my own truth. Plus there are some outside of the MSM (Stewart, Colbert, Olbermann) that are pretty good at calling bullshit. The problem with FOX News to a great extent and CNN, MSNBC and the networks to a lesser extent is that they have few people that are the slightest bit interested in cutting through all the spin. They are more interested in staying inside the circle and not losing their access. And with FOX, it's not just about not calling bullshit ... it's about actively creating new BS.

I'm not looking for something that is slanted a particular way. I lean left but I'm not interested in journalism that won't call the hypocrisy on both sides. Chuck Hagel may be a Republican but he deserves credit for his honest stance on the war. Joe Biden may be a Democrat but he deserves every bit of the guff that he is getting for the patronizing, borderline racist comments that he made about Barack Obama.

Maybe it's all a moot point. Nobody in my generation goes to the TV to get informed ... unless they have already been brainwashed. I do have some acquaintances that get their line from Hannity and O'Reilly first and then go to Newsmax or The Drudge Report. But it's all extremely incestuous. Each cites the other as a source. The consumer thinks he has two sources, but he really is just seeing two groups pushing the same bullshit info.

It's all enough to make one's head hurt. So, I do not watch any TV news. I will pop the TV on and watch CNN or MSNBC if something major has happened. Usually in the heat of the moment, news organizations haven't had enough time to develop a spin and they inadvertently tell the truth (for ex. Anderson Cooper during Katrina). But give them enough time to be tainted by politicians or by their corporate overlords and the news will be pointless. So, screw them. My CNN is Laura, Cyberkitten, Great White Bear, Jewish Atheist, etc. You are my bullshit detectors.

"Develop a built-in bullshit detector." -- Ernest Hemingway

Glendale Chocolate Affaire

Our annual trek to the Glendale Chocolate Affaire.

Legendary columnist Molly Ivins, 62, dies

From Think Progress:

“Molly Ivins, whose biting columns mixed liberal populism with an irreverent Texas wit, died at 5:30 p.m. Wednesday at her home in Austin after an up-and-down battle with breast cancer she had waged for seven years. She was 62.” From her final column, published January 12, 2007:

"We are the people who run this country. We are the deciders. And every single day, every single one of us needs to step outside and take some action to help stop this war. Raise hell. Think of something to make the ridiculous look ridiculous. Make our troops know we’re for them and trying to get them out of there.

I've read several of her books, most notably Bushwacked. She was very funny and very astute and will be genuinely missed.

Surge

One of the president's biggest supporters (and ass-kisser) is our very own, Jon Kyl. I've ran out of adjectives to describe this man's idiocy. I was listening to NPR today and they had extensive interviews with Charles Schumer and Jon Kyl (separately). Schumer was gracious, intelligent, and humorous. Kyl was petty, didactic, and nauseating in his support of Bush's plan for a troop surge. In the past, Kyl has favorably compared Bush to Lincoln, Truman, Wilson and FDR. I am getting so tired of the phrase "emboldening our enemy". Apparently any dissent of our president or any desire to save lives by not putting more troops in harm's way is considered tacit support of Al Qaeda. Kyl repeatedly said that we were "sending the wrong message" to our allies and the enemy by not blindly supporting whatever decision the president makes. Perhaps if Bush had some history of making good decisions or of not lying, we might be able to give him the benefit of the doubt. But he has spent any goodwill he may have ever had and is running a serious political capital deficit. Aren't we "sending the wrong message" if we rubber-stamp our leaders' decisions regardless of the harm they do? Most people in the world actually think that Bush is the one with the wrong message ... that the U.S. is playing a "mainly negative" role in the world today. Even our allies say, "The United States is the first to be blamed for the rise of Iranian influence in the Middle East.".

Kyl has zero credibility after repeatedly beating the Iraq war drum and being one of the biggest spouters of WMD nonsense in the lead up to the war. Kyl should just shut his pie hole.

"We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. When the loyal opposition dies, I think the soul of America dies with it." -- Edward R. Murrow

Police/RATM

WTF is going on? My two favorite and long disbanded groups, the Police and Rage Against the Machine, reuniting?

Police reunion rumors reaching fever pitch

Rage Against the Machine will reunite for Coachella

What it Meant When Abortion Was Illegal

Published on Wednesday, January 24, 2007 by the Portland Press Herald (Maine)
by J. Michael Taylor, M.D.

My father graduated from medical school in 1928 on the threshold of the Depression and set up general practice in a small New York town. My mother's engagement ring sported the world's tiniest diamond and had been given to my father by an elderly patient in payment for his compassionate care.

Our family went to church every Sunday in our "Sunday best," and like our president, my father would sometimes read the Bible in the morning before heading to work.

My parents were also Republicans -- common, and true compassionate conservatives-who would not belong to the exclusive country club and who were charitable in every sense.

Beloved by the community and particularly by his patients, he was a general practitioner that delivered babies, repaired hernias, set bones, treated pneumonia and -- well, it seemed like everything, really.

He was the school physician, and at a recent high school reunion, my classmates all had a story to tell about something that he had done for them -- fix a broken nose, coach them through a complicated labor and delivery, remove an infected gall bladder.

My father was a complex person who was difficult to know. He didn't become my hero until several years after his death in 1992, and for me, that carries all of the regrets that go with insight coming too late.

He was muscular and strong, an outdoorsman and a hunter -- a man's man. The one and only time I saw him cry, I was a sophomore in high school. His lack of control was both a shock to me and a life-altering experience where my feelings for him changed in an instant. He became human.

Dad was just home following his efforts to save a 16-year-old girl who had developed a raging infection from a "botched abortion." She was a student at the neighboring school so I didn't know her, but he knew her well.

The shame of an unintended pregnancy had forced her to an unskilled abortionist who used dirty instruments on a table in a garage. By the time she came to my father, the infection had spread, and she died under his care. He was despondent and angry for weeks.

With wisdom based on first-hand experience, my conservative parents breathed a sigh of relief at the Roe v. Wade decision back in 1973.

They knew the significance of eradicating these self-righteous, mean-spirited laws. They welcomed the end of onerous, life-threatening prohibitions on women making personal decisions about childbearing.

My dad has been gone many years, but he would not have been pleased to see science replaced by a narrow view of morality and politicians again claiming jurisdiction over women's bodies and lives a full 34 years after the Roe decision. How angry he would be to see physicians threatened and harassed for providing compassionate care to women making difficult life choices.

He had welcomed the advent of new technologies that gave women and men the opportunity to plan their families, and he would be furious, as I am, to know that our president had appointed someone who does not even support contraception to run our nation's family planning program.

Before the days of Medicare, Medicaid, and even Blue Cross/Blue Shield, my parents spent Christmas Eve in front of the fireplace going through the unpaid bills of Dad's patients. They usually burned the bills and forgave their debts, except for a few who they knew could and should pay.

The inequity of poor women -- those perhaps most impacted by an unintended pregnancy -- being denied funds for abortion care is something they could not have understood.

The issue of abortion is abstract and hypothetical for some and Roe is a history lesson for others. But for those whose memories stretch back a few decades, and for my father and all of our mothers and grandmothers and sisters, the significance of Jan. 22, 1973, can not be overstated.

This week, I am honoring my father and the memory of that 16 year-old girl. I am telling the story because going back is not an option.

J. Michael Taylor, M.D., (e-mail: jmt@dermctr.com) is a physician in Portland, Maine.

If holier-than-thou types really cared about the "culture of life", they would spend more time eradicating poverty and those conditions which make young women feel they have no choice. Instead they spend all their time trying to reverse a decision and take away a women's ability to control her own body. The irony is that "life" is an abstraction for them. They have no problem with brown people dying in a foreign land. They numb themselves to the images of 19 year old troops dying in an unjustified war. Reversing Roe v. Wade is about them checking another item off their Religious Right club checklist. A chit or Brownie point that will assure them passage into Heaven. Lives here on earth don't matter just as long as they get to the hereafter.

Children of Men/Pattern Recognition

I just finished reading Pattern Recognition by William Gibson. After having seen Children of Men a few weeks ago, I thought it'd be interesting to contrast the two. Gibson's book is ostensibly about the present but has a futuristic feel to it. Children of Men is set in the future but touches on so many topics that are of concern to us in the present.

I've been a big fan of William Gibson's work since reading Neuromancer a few years back. Neuromancer is a seminal work and introduced the word "cyberpunk" to our lexicon. The rest of his work makes a weird and disjointed near-future world seem real and plausible. In this book, he manages to use that same skill to make the real current world seem weird and disjointed (which it is).

Though written several years ago (right after 9/11), it seemed to anticipate the role of online video, netroots, and blogs. While not talking about blogs directly, the characters in this book submerse themselves in the insular world of specialized online discussion groups, sometimes to the exclusion of real life relationships ... not unlike a lot of bloggers.

Other topics that the book touches on are the role of corporations, trends and marketing.

Gibson's prose can be a bit thick sometimes, but that can be part of the allure. You wade through it not always sure that you are understanding it all but by the time you are done with the book, it all seems to make sense.

I liked this book, as I have all of Gibson's. He's the only modern sci-fi author that I've ever read, though I hope to rectify that, having just bought Snow Crash on the recommendation of several of you.



Children of Men presents dystopic view of the future, where women have lost the ability to have children due to a pandemic and government has a stronghold on the lives of everyone.

Oppression, censorship, brutality, propaganda, war make for unpleasant times but they also make for interesting and provocative cinema. The social and political movies of the the past few years, V for Vendetta, this one, Syriana, Good Night and Good Luck, etc. are among the best we've seen in a long time.

It's interesting that the setting of this sci-fi political thriller is again England. True, the source material bases it there but I think there's more to it. You see movies like this and V for Vendetta and you can't help seeing that they are criticisms of America. While England may have some of the characteristics, it's obvious that it is not the main target. England, however, is a safe target in the movies. It gets the point across without seeming like USA-bashing. And obviously the UK is also not without it's sins.

This movie is dark and atmospheric and beautifully shot by Alfonso Cuaron. There is a great group of Mexican directors right now: Cuaron (this movie, Prisoner of Azkaban, Y tu Mama Tambien), Guillermo del Toro (Pan's Labrynth, Hellboy), and Alejandro González Iñárritu (21 Grams and ... ahem, Babel).

Despite the movie's despair, there is also a vision of hope. I think this is where Children of Men is vastly superior to Babel. That vision of hope is unexpected and as such is beautiful. That's not to say that is a Hollywood sappy movie. It is so completely the opposite of that. But rather it presents the light at the end of the tunnel without having to spell it out for you and wrap it up all nice and pretty.

The acting is great, especially by Clive Owen and Michael Caine. Chiwetel Ejiofor makes yet another appearance in a movie I like, having also been in Serenity, Love Actually and Amistad.

This is a great movie and undoubtedly will be on my year-end top 10.

God/Commerce/Politics

Religious zealotry, dominionism, sexism ... now coming to a computer near you. Two instances in the last week at clients of mine showed me exactly how deep religious indoctrination goes and how it ties into unbridled consumerism.

The first instance was a client asking me if I listened to a local talk radio station, the Patriot. I demured, not wanting to offend. See ... The Patriot spews a non-stop river of bile and calls it patriotic. There was no way that I could say anything nice, so I said nothing. Their daily shows include Bill Bennett, Laura Ingraham, Dennis Prager, Hugh Hewitt ... so you can imagine the intoxicating right-wing push of it. She then specifically asked if I listened to Michael Medved. The very same Michael Medved who used to only annoy us with his movie reviews, but now has turned to being a parrot for the Right. Evidently, Mikey had recommended on his show BSafe Online filtering software, which my client bought.

Protecting your kids from objectionable content ... a noble enough pursuit.

Where it gets dicey is in who endorses it:

Rebecca Hagelin, VP at the Heritage Foundation

Mike Gallagher, conservative talk radio host and frequent FOX News contributor.

Evangelical pastor, Chuck Swindoll

Christian author, Stephen Arteburn

Christian apologist, Josh McDowell

American Family Association
Family Research Council

Very fishy. I was beginning to get suspicious. If Christian and Republican organizations want to endorse some product, that's their right, but there seemed to be something else going on here. So I dug deeper.

A Bush even endorsed the company:

BSafe to relocate to Florida

“I welcome this high-tech, pro-family business to Florida,” said Governor Jeb Bush. “

But here's the kicker:

... Bsafe Online.com is a critical component of American Family Online, Inc., a company founded to help serve families with Internet filtering. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of the American Family Association, an organization with twenty-three years of experience protecting families ...

As they say, follow the money. AFA and the Family Research Council are Dobson fronts. I never want a single dime of my money (or any sane person's) to come even close to benefitting that bigot James Dobson. There are better software alternatives for filtering that don't benefit a madman that believes that you can cure homosexuality, that women should be submissive, and that the Mark Foley scandal was an innocent prank.



The second instance of religion gone wild in the marketplace was today, when I saw the following game installed on a kid's computer in the house of one of my clients:

Left Behind: Eternal Forces.


Most of us know what Left Behind is. Well, this game makes it enjoyable for the younger set. And who doesn't love a game that can teach these valuable "family values":

- equates the United Nations with the Antichrist

- "indoctrinates children into the ideology of religious warfare"

- teaches the proper role of women in the workplace, as nurses or musicians

The synergy of religious indoctination, commerce and politics -- a site to behold.